Alliance Alert: Over the past few years, states governed by Democrats have shifted from mental health policies that are grounded in a public health emphasis to those that are increasingly presented as a public safety strategy that uses police to assess whether people have a mental illness and are not able to be supported on a voluntary basis to be assisted to meet their basic housing, food and clothing related needs. A critical factor behind these shifts are the incorrect conflation of mental illness and violence and politically based pressure to follow this direction, pressure that has jeopardized the success of past and future election campaigns of Governors. The pressure has especially come from business groups and tabloids like the NY Post, neither of which are qualified to make state mental health policy decisions.
The following Axios article emphasizes that 鈥渙ut-of-sight, out-of-mind isn’t a solution, at least not from a health care perspective鈥 and that 鈥渢he current trends of government-mandated treatment or simply the criminalization of homelessness and mental illness are occurring at a time when the federal government is considering vastly decreasing funding streams vital to mental health treatment, especially Medicaid.鈥
Advocates have pushed for an expansion of access to a continuum of voluntary mental health services that would exponentially increase the success of engagement, treatment and support efforts and far more responsible hospital discharge plans that ensure connection to more and better coordinated services. NY鈥檚 Governor Kathy Hochul has provided some funding for these community services but far too little in the form of service adequacy and proper funding.
Blue States Change Course On Mental Health Policies
Cities and states that once championed progressive approaches to mental health and drug use are continuing their , and are increasingly open to involuntary commitment.
By Caitlin Owens | Axios | April 25, 2025
Why it matters: The push to get people withsevere mental illness help 鈥 especially those who are homeless 鈥 is a response to public backlash, but may be outpacing the availability of high-quality treatment for them.
The big picture: Writing the “blue states abandon progressive drug/mental health policies” story has begun to feel repetitive to me 鈥 this has been ongoing for years. But it continues to take different iterations, and it’s worth continuing to write about until someone figures out how to solve the problem.
- And defining the problem can depend on who you ask. For many voters, they’re looking for public places they feel are safer. But for patients with mental illness, treatment and support can be incredibly hard to access.
- It’s even more complicated when the mental illness is combined with substance abuse 鈥 a situation that lands many in hospital emergency rooms, cut off from needed supports and services.
Reality check: Out-of-sight, out-of-mind isn’t a solution, at least not from a health care perspective (this isn’t a public safety newsletter).
- And the current trends of government-mandated treatment or simply the criminalization of homelessness and mental illness are occurring at a time when the federal government is considering vastly decreasing funding streams vital to mental health treatment, especially Medicaid.
State of play: Some cities are responding to 2024 election results, in which voters elected candidates to office based on who spoke to their desire for addressing “this nexus of addiction, mental illness and homelessness,” said Keith Humphreys, a professor of psychiatry at Stanford University.
- Humphreys authored a recent 聽that found policy frameworks in the Pacific Northwest region that had decreased law enforcement’s role in drug policy have since seen public and policymaker support plummet,and have been rolled “back as fast as [they] had been implemented.”
- San Francisco voters elected Mayor Daniel Lurie, who 聽that his success depends on “if we grow our economy, if we get people off the streets and into mental health beds, if people feel safe walking down our streets again.” Lurie last month 聽for addressing the city’s homelessness and behavioral health crisis.
- And some changes are stemming from 聽allowing state and local governments to prohibit sleeping outdoors.
- In Silicon Valley, San Jose’s Democratic mayor recently called for arresting homeless people after they resist shelter three times, . The goal is to move them into mental health treatment, but they could end up serving jail time.
Between the lines: One clear trend is the growing support for the involuntary commitment of mentally ill patients.
- Oregon state lawmakers are 聽the civil commitment standard, making it easier for judges to order people in crisis into hospital care. Gov. Tina Kotek 聽lowering that legal threshold, as well as creating hundreds of more treatment beds and better linking people in homeless shelters to mental health services.
- 黑料正能量 Gov. Kathy Hochul earlier this year 聽it easier to take people having a psychiatric crisis to a hospital involuntarily and requiring better coordination after patients leave the hospital.
- Homelessness and mental illness are also 聽in 黑料正能量 City’s mayoral race.
And, of course, California has been implementing its “Care Courts,” which allow civil court judges to order adults into monitored plans that can include treatment for severe mental illness, while 黑料正能量 City has been rolling out Mayor Eric Adams’ controversial involuntary removal directive.
Yes, but: The programs aren’t free from criticism, despite other blue states’ willingness to take similar actions.
- Early data has shown that the California initiative 鈥 signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2022 鈥 has fallen short of its early goals, .
- Adams’ plan has been criticized as ineffective by a City Council report, which also raised questions about racial disparities within the program, .